In 1849, writer/philosopher Henry Thoreau published the well-known essay Civil Disobedience. He was an abolitionist and objected to the institution of slavery as well as involvement in the Mexican-American War. Thoreau argues that our government is based on the point of view of the majority, which may not necessarily be morally right. Thoreau indicated that an individual does not have the responsibility to eliminate evils, but that he has the moral imperative to not participate in them. He further argues that the individual has the obligation to follow what he believes is right, and in so doing should disobey unjust laws. The question of when civil disobedience is better than obedience to law is intriguing, and certainly not reserved for the 19th century. It is as timely a topic today as it was during Thoreau’s life.
When does belief trump law? Some time ago, a pastor in Arizona made the headlines because he received a jail sentence and $12,000 fine for conducting a Bible study in his home. It was an issue over building code usage in an addition he had build that attached to his house. Apparently there had been a four-year conflict involving the homeowner, his neighbors, and the town’s officials. Some argue that he deserved the consequences because he violated the codes. The media argued that he was wrong to not comply with municipal codes, but that the punishment meted out to him was excessive and unjust. Finally, others argue that he should not have been fined or jailed at all because he has the right to use his home as he chooses.